Back to Facility Manager Contents

Back to Home 

 
 

(continued from April/May 2011)

By Dana Glazier, CAE;
Mark Emch, Vice President,
Finance, San Diego Convention Center
and Steve Schwartz, Senior Research Policy Manager,
Washington Convention Center


After looking at the big picture economic conditions for all venue types, some interesting trends were found between and among venue types. Some venues are faring better than others, while some are not doing as well but are optimistic that 2011 will hold improvements. The largest group of arenas (33.8%) expects conditions to remain fl at for 2011, while a combined 54.4% expect conditions to improve at some point in 2011. More than half of the performing arts centers (57.5%) expect conditions to improve sometime during 2011, while most of the convention centers (60%) and complexes (69.3%) are expecting improvements in 2011.

I. Major Financial Indicators – ACTUAL changes from 2009 to 2010 by venue type:
ARENAS

As noted in Table 1, arena responses are similar to venues overall response to major indicators. When looking specifically at the combined increases and combined decreases, the percentages are roughly equal on each side for number of events (44.1% saw an increase; 44.7% decrease), the rental generated by events (41.1% increase; 39.7% decrease), food and beverage revenue (39.7% increase; 41.2% decrease). More arenas report attendance decreases (46.9%) than increases (36.3%), and ancillary revenue is also leaning more towards decreasing (41.7%) than increasing (26.9%). Operating expenses are up for 41.9% of the arenas that responded.

PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS A
s noted in Table 1, performing arts centers are less positive for major indicators compared to venues overall. The largest percentages are seeing the “same” numbers when comparing 2009 to 2010 with the exception of attendance. A review of the combined increases and decreases indicate that the percentages are higher for decreases than increases, with the exception of operational expenses: Number of events (32.7% increase; 48.0% decrease), rental generated by events (38.6% increase; 40.4% decrease), food and beverage revenue (25.5% increase; 30.9% decrease), attendance (38.6% increase; 43.9% decrease), and ancillary revenue (23.2% increase; 39.2% decrease). More performing arts centers see increases in operating expenses (32.2%) than decreases (30.4%).

CONVENTION CENTERS
As noted in Table 1, the largest percentage of convention centers respondents see 1-5% decreases in most major indicators. When comparing the combined increases to the combined decreases, the percentages are split. There are roughly as many reporting decreases as increases in number of events (46.0% increase; 44.0% decrease), rental generated by events (48.0% increase; 46.0% decrease), attendance for events (40.8% increase; 42.8% decrease), and ancillary revenue (44.7% increase; 46.8% decrease). Food and beverage revenue is the exception (53.0% saw an increase; 36.7% decrease) with the largest percentage reporting an increase of more than 10%. Operating expenses are also split (42.0% increase; 44.0% decrease).

COMPLEXES
As noted in Table 1, complex responses are slightly different to venues overall in the major indicators. When looking specifically at the combined increases and combined decreases, the percentages are similar on each side for number of events (38.2% increase; 42.9% decrease), attendance (45.0% increase; 42.5% decrease), and the rental generated by events (45.0% increase; 42.5% decrease). A larger percentage of complexes report increases for ancillary revenue (47.5% increase; 35.0% decrease), and food and beverage revenue (50.0% increase; 35.0% decrease). Operating expenses increased (41.9%) for more complexes than decreased (32.8%).

II. Major Financial Indicators – ANTICIPATED changes from 2010 to 2011:
ARENAS

Again, arena responses are similar to venues overall responses in the major indicators. When looking specifically at the combined anticipated changes, the responses mirror the division of the overall outlook and optimism of the industry. The indicators are expected to increase or stay the same by the majority. The largest swing from last year’s actual to this year’s anticipated is in attendance. Fifty-three percent of arena respondents expect an increase in attendance.

     Arenas are expecting increases in the major financial indicators. Most arena respondents say they expect events to increase (44.2%), rental to increase (45.6%), food and beverage revenue to increase (45.4%), and attendance to increase (53%). Most believe ancillary revenue will stay the same (52.3%). Arena managers also expect the operating expenses to stay the same (47.1%).

PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS
Table 2 shows that the largest group of the performing arts centers expects the major indicators to stay flat or show a 1-5% increase, including the number of events and the rental generated by events. Because the majority of the performing arts centers indicate seeing decreases in major indicators in 2009, it appears logical that they will be cautious when predicting increases for their respective venues. Many expect events to increase (50.0%), rental to increase (53.7%), food and beverage revenue to increase (38.4%), and attendance to increase (50.9%). The majority report ancillary revenue will stay the same (51.9%) while operating expenses will increase (55.6%).

CONVENTION CENTERS
Table 2 shows that the majority of convention center respondents are looking for 1-5% increases in indicators in 2011, which closely resembles the expectations by venues overall. The largest group of convention centers (48.9%) is specifically anticipating ancillary revenue to increase.
    
     The combined anticipated changes of convention centers are expecting increases in all of the major financial indicators. The majority say the
y expect events to increase (54.0%), rental to increase (50.0%), food and beverage revenue to increase (58.4%), attendance to increase (61.6%), and ancillary revenue to increase (61.6%). Convention centers also expect the operating expenses to increase (46%).

COMPLEXES
Table 2 clearly presents the optimism of complex participants over the other venue types. For all of the major financial indicators, the complexes, more so than other venues, expect increases. The largest swing from last year’s actual to this year’s anticipated is in attendance. Sixty-nine percent of complex respondents expect an increase in attendance, while 59.0% forecast a 1-5% increase in food and beverage revenue.

     When looking at the combined expected increases in comparison to the combined expected decreases, the difference appears even more dramatic. The majority (57.9%) expect increases in the number of events (10.5% decrease), rental generated by events (53.8% increase; 15.4% decrease), food and beverage revenue (59.0% increase; 10.3% decrease), attendance (69.3% increase; 15.4% decrease), and ancillary revenue (53.9% saw increase; 12.9% decrease). As would be expected, with the optimism regarding increased attendance, events and revenues, the majority of complexes also expect operating expenses to increase (55.2%) rather than to decrease (15.8%).

III. Business response:
The business response related to staffing in venues overall is similar to the response in 2009. Basic business practices related to adapting to the strenuous times continues to be challenging with a reported increase in aging receivables, downsizing of significant or large events, and permanent loss in major booked events. The largest changes are in renegotiated payment schedules, tougher negotiations, and reductions in fee-for-service offerings.

ARENAS
The largest group of arenas (44.8%) maintain their planned staffing levels, replacing all positions when vacancies occurred, which was similar to the 2009 responses. The second largest group (23.9%) reduces staff through layoffs, buyouts or reduction in force in 2010; whereas only 8.1% reduced staff in this manner in 2009. Like the venues overall responses, more arenas are reporting increases in aging receivables, renegotiated payment schedules, tougher negotiations, and reductions in fee- for- service offerings than in 2009.

PERFORMING ARTS CENTERS
The largest group of performing arts center respondents (42.9%) maintain planned staffing levels, replacing all positions when vacancies occur, which is down from 2009. Up from 2009 and similar to venues overall, a large percentage of performing arts centers (21.4%) reduced planned staffing levels through layoffs, buyouts or reduction in force.

     Performing arts centers are experiencing longer and tougher negotiations, similar to venues overall, as well as an increased downsizing of major booked events. Compared to 2009, less performing arts centers reported cancellation of major booked events.

CONVENTION CENTERS
The largest group of convention center respondents (27.5%) maintain their planned staffing levels, not replacing non-essential positions when vacancies occur, which is consistent with the 2009 responses. The second largest group (23.5%) reduced staff through layoffs, buyouts or reduction in force in 2010; whereas only 15.0% did in 2009.

Like the venues overall response, many convention centers report an increase in aging receivables, reductions in fee-for service offerings, and downsizing of major booked events than in 2009. In contrast to all venues, as well as 2009, convention centers feel the pinch of difficult economic times with renegotiated payment schedules and tougher contract negotiations.

COMPLEXES
Two large contingencies of complexes (each 37.5%) reported that they: 1. maintain their planned staffing levels, replacing all positions when vacancies occur, and 2. maintain their planned staffing levels, not replacing non-essential positions when vacancies occurred. This is an improvement over 2009, when the majority of complexes reduced planned staffing levels through layoffs, buyouts or reduction in force (28.6%) and did not replace non-essential positions (28.6%).

     The comparison of venues overall to complexes shows that more complexes experience an increase in cancellations of major booked events (all venues 18.9%; complexes 38.7%) and a permanent loss of major booked events (all venues 16.2%; complexes 25.8%), which appears to be inconsistent with their generally more positive view for 2011. In 2010, more complexes report managing tougher negotiations, and reductions in fee-for service offerings than in 2009.
fm

NOTE: The response rate for stadium managers is statistically invalid due to low response. For discussions and to offer feedback, visit the Venue Managers Open Forum on IAVM VenueNet. Venue Sector reports are also available in the Venue Managers Open Forum library on VenueNet. Questions or comments: dana.glazier@iavm.org  
  

 
 

© 2002-2011 International Association of Venue Managers 635 Fritz Dr. 
Coppell, TX 75019 USA Phone: 972/906-7441 Fax: 972/906-7418

 

"